Xiaobian said today that the city of Mitsubishi Mirage car, this car is also rated badly on the Internet. First of all, let's take a look at Xiao Bian's assessment of this car. It is expensive, slow, and terrible driving. A pile of metal, no feeling, and no taste, no ability or anything, really. It is also extremely poor. This is Mitsubishi's cheap supermini. You should avoid it at all costs. This car is slightly more comfortable than the bus. The feeling of driving: the steering wheel is slow and fuzzy. It has a wide range of scrolling. There is no grip. Every lump and fold on the road passes directly behind you. Quarreling. Hell, there's too much slack on the steering wheel, you can't tell what the wheel points to.
Inside the layout and space, there are a lot of kits - power windows, USB connections, climate control and keyless entry - all standard on high-end phantoms - but they do not cover up those irreparable cheap fabrics or fragile plastics. These hard, uncarved seats look and feel like they were moved directly from a 1991 Peugeot 106 car, and its headwear is so thin that you may read it through. The amount of oil consumed is also quite high. There is only one engine. This is a 79 bhp 1.2-liter petrol, which is lower than the CO2 tax threshold of 100 g/km, so there is no need to pay the annual VED. Combining the mass of 845 kilograms of feathers with a low drag coefficient, the engine also manages a majestic 65.7 mpg and 99 g/km CO2. Its turning circle is also the tightest in its class, an increase of 75 liters over its predecessor (Colt)'s lead space, to 235 liters.
We compare the Ford Fiesta to the Mitsubishi Phantom because it is the only model on the market equipped with a three-cylinder engine except for Phantom, but the fact that the Ford 1.0-liter turbocharged EcoBoost engine provides a maximum power of 123 hp and a peak torque of 125 Lb-ft, while the Mirage 1.2-liter naturally supercharged engine has a maximum output of only 78 horsepower and a peak torque of only 74 lb-ft. The three giants of the US market - Mini, Smart, and BMW - all use turbocharged engines. Although the 2017 version of the Phantom has a 4-horsepower increase in maximum output power, the key to improving performance is the right weight. Indeed, the weight of the 17th edition of the Phantom has been adjusted, about 200 pounds lighter than the Chevrolet Spark, and about 500 pounds lighter than the 1.0-liter Ford Fiesta. However, at the time of testing, we did not want Phantom to translate the weight reduction into a flexible acceleration. The 2017 phantom of our test drive is a version equipped with a CVT.
On the other hand, the best fuel economy for the 2017 Mitsubishi Mirage is 37 miles on city roads and 43 miles on roads. The EPA fuel economy with a five-speed manual transmission phantom is 4 miles less in the city and 2 kilometers less on the road. It is worth noting that the fuel economy of the Ford Fiesta with a three-cylinder engine can reach 41 miles on the road. Mitsubishi Mirage invested a lot of money to quickly shape, including front and rear panels, lights, and wheels. Inside the car are a new dashboard, a new steering wheel, upgraded connections (Apple Car Play and Android Auto), a Rockford For gate audio option, including seats, but the lateral support of the seat is not very satisfactory, I thought This car is really not worthy of the GT logo.
No comments:
Post a Comment